Should I leave the fallen apples under the tree or clear them up? I get contradictory advice every autumn.
Old apple tree, more fruit than we can use, and every year a large amount ends up on the ground.
One neighbour says leave them — they rot down, feed the soil, and the birds and insects use them. Another says clear every one, or you are cultivating disease and rats for next year.
Both sound plausible and they cannot both be right for the same tree.
- What is the actual risk of leaving them?
- Does rotting fruit meaningfully feed the tree, or is that wishful thinking?
- Is there a middle position rather than all or nothing?
@trail_quiet_tor · 22h ago · 2 replies
Both neighbours are right about different fruit, and the distinction is whether the apple is rotting or diseased.
A sound apple that fell because it was ripe, and is now breaking down on the ground, is compost with extra steps. It feeds soil life, birds and insects eat it, and it carries no particular risk.
An apple that fell because it was diseased is a different object. Brown rot in particular overwinters in fruit — including fruit that dries out and stays hanging in the tree, which is the part people miss. Leave those and you are storing next season's infection at the base of the tree, ready to splash up in spring rain.
So the sorting rule is: sound windfalls can stay, visibly rotten or mummified fruit goes, and anything still attached and shrivelled should be picked off and removed too. That single distinction resolves most of the argument, and it is why two experienced gardeners can disagree honestly — they are each picturing a different pile.
Reply
Report
@windfall_wim · 2d ago
The mummified fruit still in the tree is something neither neighbour mentioned and I have definitely been leaving those every year.
Reply
Report