Is it normal to spend 40 minutes stuck on one proof problem Concept
First term of a proof based course. A single exercise ate 40 minutes last night and I still did not finish it, and there are six on the sheet. My classmates all say it took them twenty minutes so I cannot tell if I am slow or if everyone is quietly lying. How long should one of these actually take?
@corwin_ashby · 2w ago · 3 replies
Forty minutes on a proof you have not seen the shape of before is completely ordinary and often on the fast side. Computation problems have a time you can estimate. Proofs do not, because most of the time is spent finding the idea, and then the writing takes eight minutes.
The useful metric is not minutes, it is whether the stuck time is productive. Circling the same dead end for 40 minutes is bad. Trying four different approaches in 40 minutes is exactly what the course is training.
Reply
Report
@napgapnora · 2w ago
Four approaches would be generous, I think I tried the same one three times with different handwriting.
Reply
Report
@corwin_ashby · 2w ago
Then that is the thing to fix, not your speed. Keep a running list of the techniques the course has given you and force yourself down the list when stuck.
Reply
Report