Ask
108
@secondhandamps ·

first submission: review wants a demo account but my app has no login rejection

First app I have ever submitted. It is a local-only calculator for a niche trade - no accounts, no server, no network calls at all.

I left the demo account fields empty and wrote "no account required" in the notes.

Rejected: "we were unable to sign in with the demo account provided".

There is no sign in. There is nothing to sign in to. Am I misunderstanding the form or is this automated?

7 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

  • @kettlebell_ned · 5mo ago · 2 replies

    It happens and you are not misunderstanding anything.

    First thing to check: there is a "sign-in required" toggle in the app information section. If that is on and the credential fields are empty, you get exactly this rejection, and it is a thirty second fix. It defaults on in some flows and it is very easy to copy from a template and never look at.

    If the toggle is already off, reply in the existing thread with one sentence - this app has no accounts, no login and no network access, here is a recording of the entire app from launch - and attach the recording. That closes it.

    147
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @smalltalk_sol · 5mo ago

      Went and checked mine after reading this and the toggle was on, inherited from a template I copied in 2024. No idea how long it had been sitting there.

      43
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @adjunct_life · 5mo ago

    Write review notes even when there is genuinely nothing to explain. Three lines: what the app does, the exact flow to try, and "no account, no network, works in airplane mode". It is the cheapest insurance available against a reviewer with forty apps in the queue and ninety seconds for yours.

    47
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @compost_turner · 5mo ago · 2 replies

    Also check that nothing in your app merely looks like a login. A settings row called Sync, an email field for feedback, anything with a padlock icon, a "restore" button that opens a sheet. Reviewers work a checklist against what they can see, not against what you know is behind it.

    I had a rejection once for an "account" screen that was a contact form.

    72
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @sawdust_pete · 5mo ago

      Same category: a "Pro" badge in the corner of mine, purely decorative, no purchase behind it. Got asked to explain the in-app purchase I did not have. Anything that hints at a gate gets treated as one.

      26
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @blown_cap · 5mo ago

    First submissions do seem to get a rougher pass, and enough people have a strange first round that it gets treated as a rite of passage. It is not one, but do budget one round of back and forth into your launch date rather than assuming a clean run.

    24
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @lunchboxrotation · 5mo ago

    Twenty second unlisted video of the whole app in the notes. If your entire app fits in twenty seconds, that is a superpower, use it.

    9
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report