Ask
247
@psu_paula ·

$240 of ads, 1142 clicks, 3 emails - did i test the idea or the page Smoke Test

Nine days of exact-match search ads on three keywords. 41,300 impressions, 1,142 clicks at $0.21, and 3 email addresses. Scroll tracking says 402 people made it past the hero, 31 clicked "get early access", 3 finished.

That is 0.26% of clicks. I have read that a decent landing page does 1-3%, so on paper this is a failure, but I genuinely cannot tell whether nobody wants the product or whether my page is bad. How do you separate those two with this data?

10 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

  • @interval_ida · last wk. · 3 replies

    You tested the page, and specifically you tested the first screen of it.

    65% of paid clicks left before scrolling. Those people never saw your offer, your pricing or your CTA - they saw a headline and decided it was not what they searched for. Nothing below the fold has been evaluated by anyone, so you have no information about the idea at all yet.

    What I would do with the next $240:

    • Same three keywords, three headlines, split evenly. Change nothing else.
    • Make each headline literally echo the search phrase. Search intent match is the whole game above the fold.
    • Watch 20 session recordings. Twenty is enough to see the pattern and it takes an hour.

    The 31 who clicked the CTA and the 3 who finished is your other clue: 90% of people who wanted it abandoned at the form. Look at what that form asks for.

    47
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @psu_paula · 2w ago

      The form asked for name, email, company size and "what are you using today" as a required field. I wrote that in about four minutes and never thought about it again. That is almost certainly the 31 to 3.

      13
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @committee_kim · last wk.

      Required free-text on a first-touch form is a wall. Take everything out except email, ask the rest on the thank-you page where the answer costs you nothing if they bail.

      10
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @committee_kim · last wk. · 3 replies

    There is a third possibility you have not listed: paid search is the wrong instrument for this idea.

    Search traffic finds people who already know they have a problem and are shopping for a solution to it. If your product is a category that does not exist yet, nobody types it into a search bar, and the people who do type your keywords are looking for the existing thing. You get clicks from people expecting a competitor and they bounce, which looks exactly like your numbers.

    Test for that: what were the three keywords? If they are the names of established categories, you paid to send people expecting a familiar product to a page describing an unfamiliar one.

    36
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @psu_paula · 2w ago

      Two of the three are competitor category names. So a good chunk of that 65% bounce is people who searched for a known tool, landed on a page that is not it, and left in two seconds. That is not a verdict on the idea at all.

      13
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @clay_bertram · last wk.

      Then your cheapest next test is not another ad round, it is finding where those people already gather and reading how they describe the problem when nobody is selling to them.

      10
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @clay_bertram · 2w ago

    402 people saw your actual offer. That is a real sample and it is enough to say something.

    If 402 people who searched for this exact thing read what you do and 3 gave you an email, the message is not landing. Could be the page, could be the idea. But "not enough data" is not the excuse here - you have plenty of data about the top of the funnel and none about the bottom, which tells you where to spend the next round.

    24
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @lowtech_lior · 2w ago

    "Get early access" is asking them to want a future thing. Try asking them to do the thing: "see it on your own data", "send me your current spreadsheet and I will run it". CTA copy moves this number more than people expect, and it also tells you whether they have the problem badly enough to hand over a file.

    19
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @notice_period · 2w ago

    $240 on ads before you have talked to ten people is a very expensive way to learn a headline is unclear. Ads amplify a message that already works; they do not discover one. Ten conversations would have given you the headline for free and then this test would have meant something.

    15
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @layoverlurker · 2w ago

    $80 per email address. At that rate a 10-person beta costs the same as a used laptop.

    9
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report