356
@carb_clean_cal ·

Vintage skillet at £45 or a new one at £30 for someone who cooks daily Identification

I cook most nights and want one 10 inch pan that lives on the hob. Local antique shop has a smooth old skillet, no maker's mark, for £45. New one from a big brand is £30 and I know exactly what I'm getting. I don't want a collection, I want the pan I use for eggs and searing for the next twenty years. Is the vintage premium worth it for actual cooking?

8 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

  • @seasoned_sid · 4mo ago · 3 replies

    For daily cooking the vintage one is genuinely better, and the reason is weight and surface, not romance. Old pans were sand cast then machined smooth, so the cooking surface starts nearly polished — food releases better from day one. They're also typically 20-30% lighter for the same size, which matters a lot when you're lifting it every evening.

    Modern pans have a pebbly as-cast texture. It does smooth over with years of use, but you're doing the machining yourself with a spatula over a long time. £15 to skip that is fine.

    Check before you buy: flat on a worktop with no rocking, no cracks especially where the handle meets the body, and no dome in the middle.

    612
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @seasoned_sid · 4mo ago

      That's the most common reason a pan doesn't get used. A pan that lives on the hob needs to be one you'll pick up without thinking.

      267
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @carb_clean_cal · 4mo ago

      Didn't know the weight difference was that big. That alone probably decides it — I've got a modern 12 inch that I avoid using because it's a workout.

      143
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @browns_and_greens · 4mo ago

    £45 for an unmarked vintage 10 inch is a fair-to-slightly-high price, not a rip-off. If it's in good shape and you like the feel of it, buy it. Unmarked ones are cheaper precisely because collectors don't want them, which is perfect for someone who wants to cook.

    289
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @carbon_steel_cam · 4mo ago · 3 replies

    Counterpoint: you can sand a modern pan smooth in about twenty minutes with an orbital sander and 80 then 120 grit, then season it. Costs nothing if you own the tool and you end up with a smooth pan for £30. Plenty of people do this and the results are indistinguishable in the pan.

    387
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @levain_lorna · 4mo ago

      True, though do it outside with a mask on. Cast iron dust is unpleasant and gets everywhere.

      156
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @carb_clean_cal · 4mo ago

      I don't own a sander so that's £30 plus a tool, which puts it above the vintage price. Useful to know it's an option though.

      89
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @wild_ferment · 4mo ago

    Whichever you buy, 10 inch is a good call. It's the size that does eggs, one or two chops and a batch of onions without being unwieldy. 12 inch sounds more versatile and mostly ends up in a cupboard.

    234
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report