Dividend portfolio versus a broad index in a taxable account, did the tax drag change your mind?
I am 34, everything tax sheltered is already full, and the rest goes into one broad market index fund in a plain taxable account. I am tempted to move maybe 30 percent into individual dividend payers, honestly for psychological reasons more than mathematical ones, because seeing cash arrive stops me fiddling. What I cannot get a straight read on is how much the annual taxable income actually costs me over a couple of decades. Looking for people who have held both in taxable and can say what it felt like on the tax return, not a theory argument.
@four_percent_fi · 2mo ago · 2 replies
Respectfully, the tax argument is the second problem and people fixate on it because it is the quantifiable one. The first problem is that thirty percent in individual payers means you now own maybe twenty companies picked by a screen, and your outcome depends on those twenty continuing to pay. I held a portfolio like that through a stretch where several cut, and my income line dropped by about a fifth in a year while the index kept doing what indexes do. If you want the psychological benefit without the concentration, a broad dividend focused fund gets you most of the feeling and none of the twenty company risk.
Reply
Report
@chapter_cass · 2mo ago
This is the better critique and I should have led with it. Tax drag is a known cost you can estimate in advance. Concentration is the one that surprises people.
Reply
Report