Someone explains a thing, I follow every step, it makes total sense and I feel the click. An hour later I could not reproduce a single line of it and I am back where I started. This happens with work concepts, with maths, with how anything mechanical works. I have started to wonder whether the click I feel is real understanding or just the pleasant feeling of following along.
Related trick that costs nothing: explain it to an object. Talk it through to a wall, a plant, a rubber duck, whatever. It feels ridiculous for about eleven seconds and then it works, because speaking forces sequence and sequence exposes the gaps that nodding along conceals. I have solved a lot of problems this way while my colleague was still walking over to my desk.
Half the questions I have typed out and never sent were answered by the act of typing them out. Same mechanism.
Sleep and spacing do most of the rest. Something explained once and never revisited is largely gone within a day or two, and the single most efficient intervention is one short revisit the following day, then another after a week. Two minutes each. That is not a study technique so much as how memory happens to work.
And revisit by trying to recall it, not by rereading. Rereading feels productive and does very little; retrieving is uncomfortable and does almost all of it.
Honest note: some things need three passes months apart and there is no technique that collapses that. I have understood the same concept four times, each time slightly more deeply, and only on the fourth could I have taught it. That is not failure, it is what learning a hard thing looks like from the inside.
@labcoat_lior · 3d ago · 3 replies
Normal, extremely common, and your suspicion at the end is correct. Following an explanation and being able to produce it are different abilities, and the feeling of clicking is generated by the first one.
When someone explains well, each step is made obvious by the step before it. You are recognising, which is easy and feels wonderful. Recall, building the chain yourself from nothing, is a different and harder operation, and you never practised it because the explanation was doing that part for you.
What fixes it, and it is not more explanations. Within about ten minutes, close everything and retell it out loud from memory, badly, to nobody. The point is to find the exact place where you stall, because that place is the thing you did not understand, and it is usually one specific joint in the argument, not the whole topic.
Then write the explanation down as a question rather than as notes. Not the answer, the question that the answer answers. A week later the question is useful and a page of notes is a page you skim and feel vaguely familiar with, which is the same trap again.
And revisit once the next day. One revisit at 24 hours does an unreasonable proportion of the work.
Reply
Report
@peer_review_pat · 3d ago
The stall point being the actual gap is the most useful thing in this thread. It turns a vague sense of not getting it into one specific question you can go and ask.
Reply
Report
@etym_elliot · 5d ago
Tried it after a work explanation this afternoon. Stalled at exactly one sentence, went back and asked about that sentence only, and now I think I actually have it.
Reply
Report