Build the manual version by hand or spend two weekends automating it first Cut the Scope
My idea is a weekly digest of new listings in a niche marketplace. Doing it by hand takes me about 90 minutes a week: search, copy, write short notes, send. I have six subscribers, all people I know. Writing the scraper and the sending pipeline would take me two full weekends, maybe more given the site changes its layout regularly. Part of me thinks automating first is obviously right and part of me thinks that is the trap.
@ask_first_ari · 9mo ago · 3 replies
Do it by hand until it hurts, and be specific about what hurting means so you know when you have arrived.
Right now 90 minutes a week for six people is completely sustainable. Automating that saves you 90 minutes and costs you two weekends, so it pays back in about ten weeks if nothing breaks, and something will break because you already said the site changes layout.
The number I would use as a trigger is subscribers. At six, do it by hand. At fifty, the manual version starts costing real time and the digest matters enough to be worth building. Between those, automate the single most annoying step rather than the whole pipeline. For most people doing this, that is the copying, not the sending.
There is also a thing you get from the manual version that you cannot buy later: you will notice which listings are actually interesting, and that judgement is the only part of your digest that a scraper cannot reproduce.
Reply
Report
@scopecreep_sam · 9mo ago
The trigger number is the useful part. Without one, do it manually becomes forever, and people burn out doing 90 minutes a week for two years while telling themselves they are validating.
Reply
Report
@margin_notes_mo · 9mo ago
Second the point about judgement. The digests I actually read are the ones where a human decided something was worth including. A complete automated feed of everything new is a thing I already have and ignore.
Reply
Report