How long before a weekly review stops taking two hours to get through Planning
Started doing a proper weekly review five weeks ago. The first one took nearly three hours, and they've settled at around two, which is a big chunk of a Friday afternoon and I can feel myself starting to skip it. Everything I read makes it sound like a brisk half hour. Is it supposed to get faster on its own, and roughly when, or does two hours mean I'm doing something wrong?
@timeblock_tess · last yr. · 3 replies
It gets faster, and five weeks is early. Mine went from about two and a half hours to a steady 35 minutes over roughly three months.
The reason yours is long is almost certainly that you're doing work during the review rather than reviewing. If you open an email during it and reply, that's not a review, that's a Friday afternoon of email with a review-shaped label on it.
Try it with a timer and a rule: nothing gets done, everything gets decided. If an item needs 20 minutes of work, it goes on next week's plan and you move on. That single rule cut mine in half immediately.
The other reason it shrinks over time is that the first few reviews are clearing a backlog you built over years. Once that's gone, you're only reviewing one week's worth of change.
Reply
Report
@solo_supper · last yr.
I definitely do work during it. Last week I wrote an entire proposal in the middle of the review and then wondered why it took two hours.
Reply
Report
@timeblock_tess · last yr.
Very common, and it feels productive, which is why it survives. Set a 40 minute timer and let the timer be the bad guy.
Reply
Report