276
@semver_sid ·

£350 for better monitors or for room treatment in a rented bedroom Gear Help

I have entry level 5 inch monitors and an untreated 3.5 by 4 metre bedroom with a carpet and a bed. I can't drill into walls, landlord's rules. £350 available. Everyone online says treatment first but the no-drilling constraint makes that awkward, and I keep wondering if better monitors would just be the simpler win. Which actually improves my mixes more?

9 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

  • @rawfileruth · 11mo ago · 3 replies

    Treatment, and the no-drilling thing is much less of a barrier than you think. Freestanding panels on cheap mic stands or leaned against the wall behind a bookshelf work almost as well as mounted ones, and you take them with you when you move — which you can't do with landlord goodwill.

    For £350 in a room that size I'd do: four 10cm mineral wool panels in fabric, two floor-to-ceiling corner stacks, and use the bed as it is (it's already a big absorber, put it behind your listening position not beside it). That's a bigger change than swapping 5 inch monitors for slightly better 5 inch monitors, which mostly buys you a flatter top end you can't hear properly in an untreated room anyway.

    534
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @rawfileruth · 11mo ago

      The gap actually helps — an air gap behind an absorber extends how low it works. A panel 10cm off the wall behaves like a thicker panel. Leaning is fine.

      267
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @semver_sid · 11mo ago

      Hadn't considered leaning them or using stands. Does a leaning panel really work or does the gap behind it ruin it?

      63
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @yamlfatigue · 11mo ago · 3 replies

    Mild dissent: if your current monitors are genuinely bad — cheap ported plastic things with a hyped bass bump — then treatment won't rescue them, because you'll be treating a room to accurately reveal an inaccurate speaker. What have you got? That changes the answer.

    234
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @yamlfatigue · 11mo ago

      Then they're fine and treatment is the right call. That tier is honest enough that the room is definitely your limiting factor.

      156
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @semver_sid · 11mo ago

      They're the entry model from a well known brand, about £250 a pair four years ago. Not terrible, not great.

      48
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @carb_clean_cal · 11mo ago · 2 replies

    Split it. £200 on treatment, £120 on a decent pair of monitor stands if you're on a desk, and the rest on a measurement mic. Getting the monitors off the desk surface and up to ear height is a real, audible improvement that costs almost nothing in comparison and people skip it constantly.

    398
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @monitor_riser_mo · 11mo ago

      Strongly agree on stands. Desk-mounted monitors get a comb-filtered mess from the reflection off the desk surface, and it lands right in the 1-3kHz range where vocals live.

      189
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @metronome_mira · 11mo ago

    Whatever you buy, spend an evening first on positioning — equilateral triangle, tweeters at ear height, symmetric distances to the side walls. That's free and it's a bigger jump than most £350 purchases.

    287
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report