A resume scoring tool gave me 42 out of 100 and I still got interviews. Do the scores mean anything?

Question

Ran my resume through two of the free scoring sites and got 42 and 61 on essentially the same document, with contradictory advice about bullet length. In the…

sourdough_stella · Accepted Answer

You have to score well or the tracking system rejects you before a human ever sees it. Something like three quarters of resumes get filtered out automatically on keywords, which is why the scoring tools exist. I would fix the score before you do anything else.

career_ladder_kim · Answer

Two tools disagreeing by nineteen points on the same document tells you everything about the measurement. What they can usefully catch is mechanical: a file that turns to soup when parsed, dates in a format nothing recognises, contact details in a header that some parsers drop, and text living inside an image. Run…

two_week_notice · Answer

Four screens from thirty is a good rate and it is real evidence about your actual market, whereas the score is a number generated by a company that would like to sell you a subscription. Small sample, yes, but it is a sample of the thing you care about rather than a proxy for it.

indent_error_ivy · Answer

The one piece of advice I took from one of those tools and kept was to cut bullets that describe responsibilities rather than outcomes. It flagged eight of mine and it was right about six. So: useful as a rubber duck, useless as a grade.

back_of_envelope · Answer

Export to a plain PDF from a single column document, no text boxes, no tables, no header or footer, and you have addressed ninety percent of what any of these tools can legitimately flag. That took me four minutes and I have never opened one since.

A resume scoring tool gave me 42 out of 100 and I still got interviews. Do the scores mean anything? Resume

8 answers