Two years self-taught and completely flat — did lessons actually unstick people, or is it just accountability?
I can play a handful of intermediate pieces from memory, I practise most days, and I have not felt myself improve since about month fourteen. Sight reading is bad, my technique feels like something I invented, and I suspect I have baked in habits I cannot see. Lessons locally are around £35 for 45 minutes, which I could just about do fortnightly. For the people who went from self-taught to a teacher: what actually changed, and how long did it take to show up?
@clinicfloor_amy · 4w ago · 3 replies
Six years self-taught, then three years with a teacher, so I can compare directly. The thing that changed was not repertoire or theory, it was that somebody watched my hands and told me things I could not possibly have noticed: that my wrist dropped on every descending run, that I was pedalling with my ear instead of my foot, that I practised at one tempo and called it practice. First six weeks were mostly unlearning and felt like going backwards. By about month four I was learning new pieces roughly twice as fast as before, and that has never gone away.
Reply
Report
@chapter_cass · 4w ago
The going-backwards phase is real and it is where most returning adults quit. Worth knowing in advance that if weeks two to six feel worse, that is the lesson working rather than the teacher being wrong for you.
Reply
Report
@etym_elliot · 4w ago
Also nobody warns you that a good teacher will spend a whole lesson on four bars. I found that infuriating for about a month and then it was the most useful thing I had ever been taught.
Reply
Report