Slow cooker already does pulled pork fine - what does sous vide give me that is worth the counter space?
Two adults, small kitchen, one free shelf. The slow cooker does chilli, pulled pork and stews and I have never once been unhappy with the result. Everything I read about sous vide is steak, and we eat steak maybe twice a month. Is there a category of food where the water bath genuinely wins, or is this already solved for the way we cook?
@cast_iron_carl · 6mo ago · 2 replies
I own both and use both, and the honest division is that the slow cooker wins anything you want to fall apart in liquid, and the water bath wins anything you want to stop at a specific texture. Chicken breast is the one that converted me - it is the difference between edible and actually good, and no slow cooker will do it. Pulled pork in a bag is a fun trick and it is not better than yours.
Reply
Report
@tension_dial · 6mo ago
Chicken breast and eggs, for me. Everything else I could live without and those two changed what I cook on a weeknight.
Reply
Report