Why does every beginner programme say three days a week when I want to train six?
I have a few months of inconsistent training behind me and I have decided to commit properly. My plan was six sessions a week, splitting body parts across days, because I have the time and the motivation.
Everything I read tells beginners to do a three-day full-body programme for the first several months instead. That feels like being told to do less than I am willing to do, which is an odd kind of advice.
Is there a real reason, or is this conservative advice aimed at people less committed than I am?
@physio_pieter · 2w ago
The second reason is that a beginner cannot yet generate enough fatigue to justify a split.
Body-part splits exist so that an advanced lifter can do a large volume of work for one muscle group and then leave it alone for a week to recover. That is a solution to a problem you do not have — your sets are light relative to what your body will eventually handle, and you recover from them quickly.
Six days of two body parts each also means a lot of your training time goes on isolation work for small muscles, which is the least productive thing a beginner can do. Three full-body sessions of compound movements cover everything with a fraction of the exercises.
And there is a practical point: three sessions is a schedule you can protect for years. Six is a schedule that survives until the first busy week, and the most common way beginners fail is not overtraining, it is stopping.
Reply
Report