Ask
158
@gimbal_gus ·

Is a webcam's built in mic ever good enough, or is that always the thing people hear?

About ten calls a week from a spare room with a hard floor, currently using the mic inside a mid-range webcam sitting on top of the monitor. Nobody has complained, and I also sound noticeably worse than the two colleagues who have arms and boom mics. Before I spend anything: is there a setup where the built-in mic is genuinely fine, or is sixty centimetres from your mouth simply a losing position?

7 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

  • @milkcratepress · 4w ago

    Two mechanisms are stacking against you. Direct sound drops steeply with distance while the reflected sound in the room stays roughly constant, so at sixty centimetres in a bare room you are capturing a much larger proportion of wall than of person. Then the software noise suppression tries to clean it up, and that is where the underwater, swirly quality comes from - it is not the capsule being bad, it is the processing working hard. Get closer and the processing has almost nothing to do.

    94
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @query_quinn · 4w ago · 2 replies

    Distance is nearly the whole game. The ratio of your voice to everything else in the room falls off fast as you move the mic away, so a cheap mic at twenty centimetres will beat an expensive one at sixty in a hard room, every time. That is why your colleagues sound better - not the microphone, the boom arm. A webcam mic is fine in a small carpeted room with soft furnishings and no other noise, and it is exactly the wrong tool in a spare room with a hard floor.

    187
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @dark_room_dev · 4w ago

      The corollary that helped me: before buying anything, try one call with the webcam mic and a rug, a duvet on the door and the blinds down. If that fixes half of it, your problem is the room and a new mic would only have half fixed it too.

      43
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @deadbug_wiring · 4w ago

    Going to defend the webcam mic slightly. For meetings - not recordings, not streams - modern noise suppression in the major conferencing apps is genuinely good, and nobody on a work call is listening for tone, they are listening for words. If nobody has complained in ten calls a week, you may be solving a problem that only exists when you compare yourself to two hobbyists. Spend the money if you want to enjoy your own voice, not because the calls are failing.

    48
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @solder_sundays · 4w ago · 2 replies

    I skipped the cheap step and bought a large condenser on an arm, and it sounded worse than the webcam for a fortnight, because a sensitive wide-pattern mic in a reflective room picks up the room enthusiastically. Ended up with a dynamic close to my mouth and it was immediately better. If your room is bare, buy for the room rather than for the spec sheet.

    62
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @bruno_calder · 4w ago

      This is the most common expensive mistake in this hobby. The mic that sounds incredible in a treated studio is the mic that sounds like a corridor in a spare room.

      24
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @filament_jam · 3w ago

    Cheapest real upgrade is a wired headset with a boom. Ugly on camera, twenty centimetres from your mouth, and it fixes echo for everyone else too.

    37
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report