After a jump start, is driving around for an hour actually equivalent to putting the battery on a charger?
Battery went flat, got a jump, and the person helping told me to drive for at least an hour to charge it back up. I did, and it started fine the next morning, so it seemed to work.
A friend says that is a myth and I should have put it on a proper charger overnight, and that driving barely does anything. But it clearly did something.
What I want to know is whether these are the same thing done two ways, or genuinely different:
- What does the alternator actually do compared to a charger?
- Is an hour of driving enough, and does it matter what kind of driving?
- If it started fine the next day, is there any reason to still put it on a charger?
@starter_motor_sam · yesterday · 2 replies
They are genuinely different, and the difference is that an alternator is a maintainer, not a charger.
An alternator is designed to replace what starting the car used — a small amount — and then run everything electrical while holding the battery topped up. It puts out a roughly fixed voltage and it is happy doing that all day. It was never designed to refill a deeply discharged battery, and it does that job badly.
A proper charger is different in two ways that matter. It steps through stages: a bulk phase at higher current, then a lower absorption phase held for a long time, then a float. And it takes hours in the later stages deliberately. Those slow final stages are where the last 20% of capacity actually goes back in — the part that decides whether the battery starts the car on a cold morning in February.
So your friend is right about the mechanism and you are right that it worked. Driving got you most of the way. It did not get you all of it, and the last part is the part that ages the battery if it is never completed.
Reply
Report
@trickle_theo · 2h ago
"Most of the way, and the last part is the part that matters for battery life" resolves it. Both people were describing different ends of the same curve.
Reply
Report