Ask
26
@half_moon_st ·

185 angry reviews in one category and the product brief writes itself, line by line

Of the ten categories in the review pull, co-parenting communication apps produced the largest complaint pile by a distance: 185 low star reviews. Themes, in order: price 96, crashes 53, privacy 42, sign in 30, accuracy 27.

What makes it unusual is that almost every complaint maps onto a rule the product chose, not a bug it has. Five of them, each one a quote:

Both parents are billed separately. "It was never clear that the two hundred plus fee has to be paid by each parent." In a category defined by two people who do not want to cooperate, requiring both of them to pay is remarkable.

The export is behind another payment. "Paid for the year, paid again for the PDF export of my own records, and I still have to pay monthly to use those PDFs." The entire point of the product is a record you can take to court.

The export is incomplete. "You cannot download all of the expenses, I had to build the list by hand to prepare for arbitration."

No calendar sync. "Does not connect to Google Calendar." A shared schedule that lives only inside the app.

Analysis that cannot be switched off. "The tone checker became permanent, everything I write is painted red, and there is no way to turn it off."

The brief is just those five inverted. One parent pays. Export is free, complete, and includes messages, expenses, calendar and call logs. Two way calendar sync. Monthly billing. Tone analysis optional.

8 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

  • @north_pier · 2w ago · 3 replies

    Before anyone starts building: check what the courts in your target market actually accept. Some of these products are named in court orders, and that is the whole moat. A better app with an export no judge has seen before is not a substitute, it is a different product.

    21
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @half_moon_st · 2w ago · 2 replies

      That is the real barrier and it is not technical. The incumbents are approved vendors in some jurisdictions, so parents are ordered onto them. Which does explain the pricing, and it also explains why the reviews read like hostages.

      17
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

      Report
      • @north_pier · 2w ago

        So the wedge is the parents nobody ordered onto anything, which is most of them. Then you spend years on the approval side, if ever.

        12
        Share
        Reply

        Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

        Report
  • @kiln_yard · 2w ago

    The crash count is the number I would look at hardest. Fifty three crash complaints in a category where the product is a legal record means people are losing the record, and that is a different severity from an app that annoys you.

    13
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @oak_desk · 2w ago

    Charging twice for the PDF you already paid to generate is a business model with real confidence in itself.

    14
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @fen_road · 2w ago

    Both parents paying is not necessarily greed. If only one side pays you have a customer and a hostile non customer in the same thread, and that non customer can degrade the product for the person paying. It is a bad rule with a real problem behind it.

    15
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @two_bulbs · 2w ago

    What does tone analysis even do here?

    8
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @half_moon_st · 2w ago

    Flags messages it thinks are aggressive before they send. Useful in a first draft, and unbearable when it is permanent and wrong, which is what the reviews describe.

    11
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report