After a very long ride I have burned far more than I ate — where does that mass physically go?
Take a long day on the bike: twenty hours of riding, plus a normal resting metabolism, adding up to something like sixteen thousand kilocalories expended. Over the same day I might eat three thousand.
So there is a large deficit, and the body supplies it from somewhere. I understand that in accounting terms.
What I have never understood is the physical fate of the mass. Fat is a substance with weight. If it is consumed, the atoms must go somewhere. They do not vanish, and I am not obviously excreting them. Where do they actually end up?
@physio_pieter · 5d ago
On your specific scenario, one correction worth making: the body does not supply an arbitrary deficit purely from fat.
On an effort of that length it will use a mix — fat, stored glycogen, and some protein, with the protein contribution rising as glycogen depletes and the effort continues. That is one reason very long events are hard on the body in ways that the calorie arithmetic does not capture.
The elevated appetite you get for a couple of days afterwards is also real and well described. Resting metabolic rate stays raised while the body repairs and refills stores, so the deficit continues after the ride while the intake catches up. That lag is normal and it is why eating well in the days after a long effort matters more than eating during it.
Reply
Report