Ask
@tamsin_rw ·

backlink_skills, backlink-pilot: 11 AI backlink repos, checked

Asked ChatGPT which GitHub projects do link building with AI. It gave me eleven repositories, a suggested five step stack, and a closing warning to stay away from anything that automates blog comments, because Google counts that as link spam. I went through all eleven today: stars, last push, and what the code does once you read past the README.

repo stars last push what the code does
codex-seo 726 6 days Codex port of claude-seo, 26 SEO workflows, backlinks among them
backlink_skills 719 today Codex fills directory forms, 743 site list, writer skills
backlink-pilot 357 172 days directory forms, awesome-list issues, batch blog comments
superseo-skills 327 14 days 135 markdown files, zero code
distribb-skill 194 27 days client for Distribb's paid plans and its backlink exchange
dataseo-mcp 192 73 days Ahrefs free tools behind a paid CAPTCHA solver
seo-skills 148 84 days skills built on SE Ranking's MCP server
qwoted-seo-backlinks-skill 138 138 days Claude drafts journalist pitches, sends them through Qwoted's internal API
backlink-outreach-js 64 189 days scrapes SERPs and contacts, writes 3 message sequences
Screaming Frog snippet 13 554 days one JavaScript file calling OpenAI web search
linklazarus 0 227 days broken link MVP, created and last pushed the same day

Median 192 stars. Four of them need more than one line.

backlink-pilot does exactly what the closing warning described. src/batch-submit.js picks one of 20 canned comments ("Bookmarked this for later. Great write-up."), signs it as one of five hardcoded commenter personas, which the code comments say rotate "to look natural", and types your URL into the website field. The target file that ships with it holds 159 blog posts and 67 profile pages, every entry tagged with the Ahrefs profile it was lifted from: 21 other sites, 18 of them game sites.

dataseo-mcp needs a CapSolver or Anti-Captcha key before any Ahrefs tool works, because that is how it clears the Turnstile check on the free tools. The README calls it educational and leaves the terms of service to you. Same approach as cnych/seo-mcp, 259 stars and 521 days since a push, whose command it still answers to.

qwoted-seo-backlinks-skill has Claude draft pitches to journalists and submits each one you approve. Qwoted's code of conduct, word for word: "Using ChatGPT or similar AI-powered tools to generate pitches for media on our platform is prohibited." Since August 2025 reporters there can see how much of a pitch Pangram thinks was AI written. The suggested stack put this at step three.

distribb-skill describes the process it runs, and step 6 is "Write and publish, always including 1-2 backlink-exchange links." Plans start at $49 a month. The Qwoted skill comes from the same team, so two of the eleven are one company's funnel, and superseo-skills and seo-skills are the front doors of InhouseSEO and SE Ranking.

Google's spam policy page, updated 28 August, still names "using automated programs or services to create links to your site", "excessive link exchanges", "low-quality directory or bookmark site links" and "forum comments with optimized links". backlink-pilot manages three of those on its own.

The list also missed the top GitHub result for "backlink" by stars: claude-seo at 17,088, the project codex-seo was ported from.

What I kept: codex-seo for reading where two competitors get their links, backlink_skills in its ten-at-a-time quality mode for a handful of directories I would have submitted to by hand anyway, and the sourced statistics page idea from the Qwoted skill, minus the pitching. Everything that posts on my behalf got deleted.

26
12 answers Share
Report
Write an answer

Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

  • @ordwick · 2h ago · 3 replies

    The Distribb line is the one I would underline for anyone skimming. People hear exchange and picture two friends swapping guest posts. A network where every article carries one or two links to other members is the textbook version of what the policy names. It can work for a while, which is the whole problem, because you do not get to pick the day it stops.

    24
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @pell_mell · 2h ago · 2 replies

      Is it the network or the anchors that get you? Two links in a relevant article does not sound that different from normal citing.

      12
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

      Report
      • @ordwick · 2h ago

        Mostly the pattern. One relevant link is a citation. The same members linking to each other on a schedule, across thousands of articles nobody reads, is a graph with a very obvious shape. And an agent writing those articles uses the anchor you asked for, every single time.

        15
        Share
        Reply

        Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

        Report
  • @sorrel_k · 2h ago · 3 replies

    The Qwoted one annoys me most, because the idea inside it is good. Build a page of properly sourced statistics on your subject and reporters who search for numbers will cite it without ever receiving a pitch. That part needs no automation and breaks no rules. Then the skill wires it to a model that writes the pitches, on the one platform that bans exactly that.

    17
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @j_arbuckle · 2h ago · 2 replies

      Does Qwoted actually enforce it, or is that a line nobody reads?

      10
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

      Report
      • @sorrel_k · 15m ago

        The code of conduct says a violation can get your account flagged to reporters as suspicious, disabled for a while, or disabled for good. Flagged to reporters is the one I would worry about. That is the exact audience you were trying to reach.

        1
        Share
        Reply

        Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

        Report
  • @pell_mell · 10h ago · 3 replies

    backlink-pilot ranks GitHub awesome lists as its best channel. GitHub puts rel=nofollow on external links in a README, you can see it on that repo's own page. A merged PR on a good list can send real readers. It is not the ranking credit the tool is selling, and opening issues on 40 lists in a week is how you end up blocked by maintainers.

    20
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @nettlebed · 2h ago

      Nofollow has been a hint rather than a hard rule since 2019, so no credit at all is a bit strong. But you cannot plan around a hint, and it is certainly no reason to spam issue trackers.

      11
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @tamsin_rw · 2h ago

      Did not know that about the nofollow. Checked my own repo, same thing. So that whole section of the tool is referral traffic, not links.

      9
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @j_arbuckle · 2h ago

    backlink-outreach-js is at least upfront about what it is: search a keyword, drop competitors, scrape contacts, write an email plus two follow-ups. The prompt for the last follow-up literally says sense of urgency, last chance. Nothing illegal, but everyone who runs a resource page has had that third email a hundred times and deletes it on sight.

    13
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @lumen_f · 2h ago

    Which of these would you actually run on a brand new site with zero links?

    8
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @lumen_f · 2h ago

    In fairness to backlink_skills, its README says outright that it is not a link spam tool, promises no dofollow and no rankings, and hands every CAPTCHA and email check back to you. The quality mode caps a batch at ten sites. It is the most careful repo on the list and it still ships a 743 site list.

    14
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report