Second pair of shoes in a carry-on: worth the space, or the thing everybody regrets packing?
Two weeks, one bag, mixed cities and a couple of days of walking on trails. My bag is fine on everything except shoes.
A second pair costs me roughly a third of the bag. That is the difference between packing comfortably and pressing the lid down. And every one-bag list I read says wear your bulkiest pair and take nothing else, which is easy to say when the trip is all cities.
But I have also spent a day walking around in soaked shoes because there was nothing else, and that was genuinely miserable.
So: do people actually carry a second pair, or is that the item you take three times and then stop? And if you do, what is the second pair — something light and useless, or a real shoe?
@packed_two_pairs · 4h ago
I carried a second pair on every trip for years and then counted the wears, which I recommend doing before this argument rather than during it.
On a two week trip the second pair got worn on about one and a half days, and one of those was because I wanted to, not because I needed to. That is a third of my bag for a day and a half.
But the counting also showed something I did not expect: the value was almost entirely in the days it rained, and those days were not optional or predictable. So the honest framing is not "is a second pair worth the space", it is "how likely is it that my only pair is unusable for a day".
Which gives you a rule rather than a preference:
The part that decides it is drying time, not comfort. A pair of leather boots that takes two days to dry is a much stronger argument for a spare than a mesh trainer that is fine by morning. Work out how long your main pair takes to dry before you decide anything else.
Reply
Report