Ask
203
@weekend_margin ·

Private hospital cover in Australia when I'm mostly healthy — is it tax maths or actual care? Health

Single, early thirties, income just under the surcharge threshold, no ongoing conditions. Everyone tells me to get hospital cover 'before you turn 31' and the reasoning always slides between the tax surcharge and the age loading without distinguishing them. I'd rather understand which one actually applies to me than buy a junk policy to dodge something I may not even owe. What made it worth it for you beyond the tax angle?

9 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

  • @yield_on_cost · last mo. · 3 replies

    They're two separate levers and conflating them is the most common mistake in this conversation. The Medicare Levy Surcharge applies above an income threshold, and only eligible hospital cover avoids it — extras-only policies don't count for that at all. Lifetime Health Cover loading is the age one: 2% added to hospital premiums for each year after 31 that you go without, capped at 70%, and removed after ten continuous years of cover. You can be below the surcharge threshold and still be accruing loading.

    154
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @weekend_margin · last mo.

      So the loading applies regardless of my income. That's the bit every article buries under a comparison table.

      43
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
    • @yield_on_cost · last mo.

      Yes. And check the ATO's own page for the current thresholds rather than an insurer's summary, because the numbers move and insurers are slow to update marketing pages.

      28
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @rebalance_rita · last mo.

    What made it worth it for me had nothing to do with tax: an elective knee procedure that would have meant a long wait in the public system. With cover I chose the timing and the surgeon. If nothing on that list applies to you, you're buying an option rather than care, and options have a price you should be able to state.

    98
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @harlan_voss · last mo. · 2 replies

    Held a cheap policy for four years purely to dodge the surcharge, never used it once, and eventually worked out the premiums were close to what the surcharge would have cost me anyway. If tax avoidance is your only reason, do the arithmetic with your actual numbers instead of assuming avoidance always wins.

    67
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @emergency_fund_ed · last mo.

      And the cheapest surcharge-avoiding policies tend to carry long waiting periods and heavy exclusions. You're not buying healthcare there, you're buying a tax status.

      31
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

      Report
  • @maren_dowd · last mo.

    Waiting periods are the thing to plan around. If you're taking cover because you expect to use it soon, read the pre-existing condition waiting period before you sign rather than at the point of claiming.

    44
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @margot_teller · last mo.

    Ambulance cover varies by state and catches people out constantly. Cheap to add, expensive to discover you didn't have it.

    26
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @zigbee_zoe · last mo.

    Anything that turns on your income and household situation is worth a conversation with an actual adviser. The general shape of the rules is public; how it lands for you specifically isn't something a forum can tell you.

    13
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously — a moderator will review it first.

    Report