Is shooting film still worth it once you price out development and scanning? Film
I inherited a working 35mm body with a 50mm lens, so the camera cost me nothing, which is the only reason I am considering this. Local lab is charging about GBP 12 a roll for develop and scan and a roll of colour film is around GBP 10, so I am looking at roughly GBP 22 for thirty-six frames before I have printed anything. I already shoot digital and I am not chasing a look I cannot get in editing, I think I am chasing the discipline of only having thirty-six. Is that a good enough reason, or does the cost kill it after three months?
@focus_pull_fenn · 4mo ago · 2 replies
The discipline is real and it is also the cheapest thing on your list to fake. Put a 50mm on your digital body, set it to manual, cover the screen with gaffer tape and give yourself thirty-six frames before you are allowed to look. If you do that for a month and still want film, you want film for its own sake, which is a perfectly good reason and the only one that survives the third month. Everyone who starts shooting film to become more deliberate and stops, stops around roll six when the lab bill arrives.
Reply
Report
@secondshooter_v · 4mo ago
Taping the screen is the single best photography exercise I know and it costs nothing. Half the people who do it discover the constraint they wanted was never about the medium at all.
Reply
Report