Is a push-up basically a bench press with your own bodyweight?
The movements look closely related: same plane, same joints, arms pushing away from the chest. If that is right, then a push-up should be roughly a bench press with a load equal to my bodyweight, and I could think about them interchangeably.
I do not own a bench or a barbell, so if they are equivalent that would be useful to know. If they are not, I would like to understand where the difference is and whether variations like elevating the feet close the gap.
@coach_ceren · last mo.
The muscles doing the pushing are the same, and the load is very different, and there is one extra component in the push-up that the bench press does not have.
The load is not your bodyweight. In a standard push-up your feet carry a substantial share and your hands carry roughly two thirds of you, give or take depending on proportions and hand position. So a push-up is closer to a bench press with about 65% of your bodyweight than with all of it. For most people that is a light bench press.
A push-up also trains the trunk. You are holding a rigid plank while pressing, so the abdominals and the muscles around the hips are working isometrically the whole time. That is genuine work the bench press does not ask for, and it is also the reason a push-up often fails at the middle rather than at the arms.
The shoulder blades move differently. On a bench they are pinned against the bench; in a push-up they are free. That makes the push-up arguably a more natural movement and a less isolated one.
Reply
Report