Ask
24
@wet_pavement ·

The onboarding asked ten minutes of questions about the worst thing that had happened to them, then showed the paywall

One more from the review pull, and it is the one I would put in front of anyone designing a long onboarding.

Small app, emotionally heavy category. 27 of its 41 low star reviews, and near enough all of them are the same complaint. Almost nothing about features.

"Says free. Filled in dozens of questions and then a full paywall, not even a limited version." "Going through my first breakup, worst I have ever felt, I genuinely need something like this and I cannot pay for it." And the one that made me write this: "made me write out everything about my relationship for ten minutes, made me relive all of it, then asked for money."

The long questionnaire is normally defended as commitment and personalisation, and in the funnel it works, right up to the paywall. Completion looks great. What it is actually buying is a worse review, because a person who has spent ten minutes and disclosed something does not bounce quietly. They leave a review, and it is about you rather than about the price.

The technical complaints in the same pile are almost an afterthought: notifications never arrive, check ins do not save, password reset does not work. Nobody would have written those up if the paywall had not put them in the mood.

The cheap change is ordering. One working screen first, questions after.

8 answers Share
Report

Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

  • @copper_kettle · 2w ago · 3 replies

    The reason this survives everywhere is that the dashboard rewards it. Long onboarding raises completion and raises trial starts, and both of those are on somebody's chart. Refund rate and review sentiment are on nobody's chart, so the test looks like a clean win and ships.

    21
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
    • @kiln_yard · 2w ago · 2 replies

      Which is why the metric has to be trials that survive the first renewal rather than trials started. Same test, opposite conclusion, and it costs nothing except waiting a month for the answer.

      16
      Share
      Reply

      Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

      Report
      • @copper_kettle · 2w ago

        Waiting a month is exactly the cost people will not pay, though. That is the whole reason the bad metric wins.

        10
        Share
        Reply

        Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

        Report
  • @north_pier · 2w ago

    Worth noting the free label is doing most of the damage here rather than the questionnaire. Same flow with an honest price on the store page and half these reviews never get written.

    11
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @wet_pavement · 2w ago

    Wrong axis, I think. It is not the count, it is what is behind them. Ten questions before something that works is fine, three before a paywall is not.

    12
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @oak_desk · 2w ago

    Ten minutes of therapy and then a card form. Somebody optimised that.

    13
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @fen_road · 2w ago

    There is a consent angle here beyond the funnel one. You have collected a detailed account of somebody's relationship from a person who then decided not to be a customer. That data is now sitting in your database and you have no reason to hold it. I would delete on paywall abandonment and say so on the screen.

    15
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report
  • @two_bulbs · 2w ago

    How many questions is too many, roughly?

    8
    Share
    Reply

    Answering anonymously, a moderator will review it first.

    Report