Why does every beginner programme say three days a week when I want to train six?
I have a few months of inconsistent training behind me and I have decided to commit properly. My plan was six sessions a week, splitting body parts across days, because I have the time and the motivation.
Everything I read tells beginners to do a three-day full-body programme for the first several months instead. That feels like being told to do less than I am willing to do, which is an odd kind of advice.
Is there a real reason, or is this conservative advice aimed at people less committed than I am?
@physio_pieter · last mo.
The second reason is that a beginner cannot yet generate enough fatigue to justify a split.
Body-part splits exist so that an advanced lifter can do a large volume of work for one muscle group and then leave it alone for a week to recover. That is a solution to a problem you do not have, your sets are light relative to what your body will eventually handle, and you recover from them quickly.
Six days of two body parts each also means a lot of your training time goes on isolation work for small muscles, which is the least productive thing a beginner can do. Three full-body sessions of compound movements cover everything with a fraction of the exercises.
And there is a practical point: three sessions is a schedule you can protect for years. Six is a schedule that survives until the first busy week, and the most common way beginners fail is not overtraining, it is stopping.
Reply
Report